The Lumix S Pro 70-200mm f/2.8 is a hefty lens, coming in at 3.46lbs. This is in part due to its 22 total elements (in 17 groups – including 1 aspherical, 3 extra-low dispersion, and 2 ultra
As I have demonstrated in this review, the new Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II works beautifully with the Nikon TC-20E III when stopped down a little, which was a nice surprise. Let’s take a closer look at the teleconverter. NIKON D3S + 300mm f/2.8 @ 600mm, ISO 640, 1/500, f/8.0 Nikon TC-20E III Specifications
Re: Tamron 70-180 f/2.8 on Nikon Z. In reply to sunnycal • May 5, 2020. Yes! it is a very great option for those who are looking for large aperture and lightweight lens. Without any sign that Tamron is making the native lenses for Z mount, it is a very tempting option for Z users. Jeff_0000's gear list:
When I was shooting Nikon (D810) I shot with this lens and it was extremely sharp - slightly better than the critically acclaimed Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 VRII (as also confirmed by DXO). When I sold my Nikon version I purchased a used Alpha mount version (non-VC) that I use on my A99's.

However, the new Nikon 70-200 2.8 VRII does have an edge in almost every respect. (Except looks; the original 70-200 2.8 is much more sexy looking!) It is noticeably sharper, so if you shoot high-end portraits and you need to make huge prints from a 36 megapixel D800, while shooting at f/2.8 all day long, then the mk2 is well worth it.

The 70-200mm f/2.8 lens is a must-have for a pro photographers, and a very desirable design for enthusiasts. But name-brand lenses are expensive—Canon sells its for $1,900, and Nikon's latest XWFEL8. 18 474 435 37 413 328 55 74 128

nikon 70 200 f2 8 review